- Crisis In Indian Banking Leads to Work Pressure and Driving Employees To Despair, Commit Extreme Steps
- Toxic work culture on the rise in banks
- 5DaysBanking: Bankers Urgently Demand 2 Days Off Per Week
- Banks see over 15% growth in new credit card addition: RBI data
- Banks Transfer ₹37,176 Crore to RBI’s Depositor Education and Awareness Fund in Last 3 Years
- Calls for Bankers’ Safety Amplified After Video of SBI Branch Manager Attack Goes Viral
- Nainital Bank Faces Privatisation Move Amid Staff Protests
- Whistleblowers Expose Nexus Operating from Three Banks
- Preserving RRBs: AIRRBEA Defends Rural Banking Against AIBOC-AIBEA Merger Proposals
- Union Bank of India’s new directive for weekend work at Retail Loan Points (RLPs) has sparked outrage among bankers
PNB AAGMAN App Faces Heat: Digital Upgrade or Staff Surveillance?
Punjab National Bank's new attendance app, AAGMAN, faces backlash from staff. Privacy concerns, redundancy, and lack of transparency, raising questions about its digital surveillance nature.
Author: Neha Bodke
Published: April 29, 2025
Punjab National Bank (PNB) began rolling out its mobile attendance application, PNB AAGMAN, at its Head Office buildings in Dwarka, Gurgaon, and Sansad Marg on April 4, 2025. The same protocol was extended to Zonal and Circle Offices from April 9. The bank calls this as a part of its ongoing digital transformation.
Linked with the bank’s Human Resource Management System (HRMS), the app allows attendance marking only within office premises using GPS-based location detection. During the attendance transition from local to central level, both biometric and manual register-based systems remain active.
However, what was launched as a step toward efficiency has triggered concern and confusion among bank employees across the levels.
Designed for Control, Delivered with Questions
The app is not listed on the Google Play Store and must be downloaded using a link or QR code circulated internally. It is currently available only for Android devices and requires employees to have their mobile numbers registered with HRMS.
The system marks the first daily punch as 'IN' and subsequent ones as 'OUT'. Employees are required to mark attendance both on entry and exit.
The concern isn’t the function, but the format.
The Privacy Anxiety Gap
One of the major issues raised by staff is the app’s potential to track users continuously once location access is granted. Although the official circular does not state that the app monitors real-time movements beyond attendance purposes, the fear persists. This has largely stemmed from the fact that employees are required to enable GPS for the app to function.
This perception of surveillance, whether grounded or not, is what’s fuelling the pushback. In absence of clear public documentation about the app’s backend behaviour, employees are leaning on caution.
As reported by some users, a further complicated issue is the app’s demand for permissions beyond location, such as access to phone calls or contacts. Although this claim is not reflected in the official rollout document, the lack of app store vetting (due to it being hosted outside Google Play) has raised questions about security compliance.
Function Over Friction: The Bank’s Side
While privacy concerns remain unresolved in the public domain, internal communication points to the bank’s focus on operational efficiency. In large campuses such as the Head Office, the app enables attendance as soon as the employee enters the premises, eliminating the need to log in at the exact workstation.
Image: Document where the PNB AAGMAN information was shared
It also helps bypass scenarios where desktop biometric systems fail due to network issues, a recurring problem in many branches. By allowing mobile-based check-ins, employees can mark their presence upon arrival without waiting for systems to boot or connectivity to stabilise.
Additionally, the app discourages previous patterns of excuse-making. Earlier, employees would cite technical glitches for missing attendance logs, something that becomes harder to justify when mobile-based check-in is available at the entrance.
A Tool for Discipline or Micromanagement?
The introduction of this system, while framed as progressive, has also reopened the long-standing debate on micromanagement in public sector banks. The move is seen by many not just as an effort to digitize attendance, but to tighten control.
Image: tweets from different accounts questioning the PNB AAGMAN app’s privacy
Officers across levels acknowledge that while such tools might improve discipline and accountability, they also risk breeding dissatisfaction. When attendance is tied strictly to geo-location and digital timestamps, the room for flexible operations, especially for field or late-shift staff becomes narrower.
In smaller branches or for managers managing multiple tasks across floors, constant check-in demands can become more of a burden than a benefit.
No Dialogue, No Trust
A significant cause of friction stems from the lack of dialogue before rollout. Staff associations were reportedly not consulted or informed in advance. In a system where change is often resisted, transparency becomes the first casualty. As a result, even well-intended tools are viewed with suspicion.
Despite the circular listing support emails for resolving technical issues, there is no formal explanation from the bank about permissions, data retention, or how long the location data is stored.
Conclusion
The PNB AAGMAN app has exposed a digital trust deficit. While the bank views it as a smart attendance solution, employees see it as another layer of oversight, one that arrived without explanation, without consultation, and without guarantees.
Until the bank issues a formal, detailed clarification on data permissions, usage boundaries, and app behaviour, the resistance will remain. Digital transformation without dialogue is no transformation at all — it is enforcement.
No comments yet.