‘GET OUT’ Public Sector Bank Retiree Alleges Humiliation, Denied Leave, and Unfair Punishment Before Retirement

A retired Chief Manager from a Public Sector Bank has come forward with serious allegations, claiming he was denied leave, publicly humiliated, and unfairly punished in the final phase of his career. has come forward with serious allegations, claiming he was denied leave, publicly humiliated, and unfairly punished in the final phase of his career.

Leave Requests Denied for Family Responsibilities
According to the officer, he had applied for seven days of joining time leave to shift his family. Only two days were approved. He was instructed to report back on the third day. Later, he applied for three days' casual leave to admit his daughter. The Zonal Manager allegedly told him to assign the task to a neighbour. He went ahead with the admission himself. On return, he was marked on Leave Without Pay (LOP) for five days.

Public Humiliation Over Legacy Account Issue
During a Branch Managers’ review meeting, the officer says he was publicly humiliated in front of 50–60 staff. The issue was related to a clearing difference that originated around seven years before he took charge of the branch. He was reportedly told to “GET out” and was immediately instructed to return to the branch.

Despite this classification, the inquiry was significantly delayed. It was only after intervention from higher management that instructions were given to complete the inquiry before his retirement. However, despite the cases being non-vigilance in nature, the punishment handed out was equivalent to that typically issued in vigilance matters.